Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Ballin' Berdych

He's big, he's bad, but he's never been past the fourth round of the Australian Open. Could this be the year?

--- San Francisco

We all know that Tomas Berdych ran the gamut of extreme highs (French Semi and Wimbledon final) and extreme lows (lost 11 of 14 to finish the season, including a first rounder at the U.S. Open) in 2010.

But anybody who relegated the 25-year-old Czech to their mental scrapheap might want to reconsider. Why? Because Berdych has game, and even if he might be prone to agonizing spells of listless, unconvincing tennis, he still remains one of the bright spots in the men's game, and one of a very small handful that could realistically be considered as a threat to break through and actually win a Slam.

Sure, it's a long shot. I'll give you that. But what so many prognosticators who have been selling off Berdych stock over the winter are forgetting is that he doesn't need to be a pillar of consistency to get it done. Sure, he's been bad of late. Sure, it's maddening. But these facts alone don't change the reality: Berdych can do it, and if he finds his best game over the next ten days, the time could be now.

As I watched Berdych come back from a set down to overpower German Philipp Kohlschreiber today, I saw many glimpses of the player that did so much damage last spring and summer on the clay of Roland Garros and the pristine lawns of Wimbledon. Sure, there were also patches of scratch-your-head and roll-your-eyes errors, but who doesn't have them over the course of a three hour match? (Especially when they go for the type of shots Berdych goes for.)

Here's my theory on why there will always be two Berdych's, and why he'll probably get better as he matures at bringing the good one to Slams and the bad one to ATP 250 events: Berdych's game is predicated on high octane offensive firepower, and he showed us all what type of mind boggling tennis he is capable of when it all clicks into place last year.

But Berdych is also a very big boy, at 6'5" and 200 lbs, and he needs to be very physical on the court to achieve his goals. We've all seen enough of Berdych to know that he doesn't generally beat a player by outfoxing them -- he beats them by getting to balls and generating massive power from improbable places on the court.

While it might have seemed easy to us while we were kicking back on the couch with our pints of Ben and Jerry's, the long summer obviously wasn't so easy for Berdych.

So he tanked the second half of the year. Big deal.

Now that Berdych has evolved into an offensive player that pretty much plays all-or-nothing tennis, the state of his game depends on the state of his body more than ever. That Berdych lost effectiveness as the year wore on (after all those matches) shouldn't really come as a surprise. But to think that he's not capable of reenergizing himself, and doing once again what he did just 6 short months ago, one would have to be delusional.

He can do it alright. And maybe next time he has a chance to do it, he will. Stranger things have certainly happened, and to players far less talented.

Monday, January 17, 2011

This, That, and the Other Thing: Day 2 Preview

Venus Williams got a nice workout yesterday against Italy's Sara Errani. A possible third-rounder with Andrea Petkovic awaits.

Greetings all --

A few quick thoughts on the golden girls, Venus Williams and Justine Henin, before I get into previewing the fantabulous day that lies ahead of us.

Venus looked pretty damn good in her 6-3, 6-2 victory over Errani last night. It was her first action since her three-set loss to Kim Clijsters at the U.S. Open, and she really didn't show any residual rust at all. She did come up a little lame after one specific backhand, and she did surprise the commentators by pulling out an inhaler during one of the changeovers, but other than that Venus casually overpowered a very tough competitor, and she did a lot of running over the course of two sets, and seemed to get better as the match wore on.

All of this bodes well for Venus at the moment, and if she manages to improve with each passing match, she'll be a very real and legitimate threat to win this thing.

Meanwhile, Justine Henin's first-rounder was not nearly as uneventful. To put it simply, Sania Mirza was out for blood last night. And while she did draw blood by taking the first set, in the end it was Henin who persevered in a very hard fought three-setter, 5-7, 6-3, 6-1.

If you're a fan of Henin I think you'd agree with me that this match was a little disconcerting. Mirza was really taking it to the Belgian at times, and Justine was doing all she could just to win her share of points. I'm not sure what anybody could have done against Mirza's onslaught however. The girl was on, and you have to give credit to Henin for battling through this match, and raising her game incrementally over the course of this tilt. By the end, what we started to see flashes of the Henin we all know is in there. As she got her feet beneath her, and her footwork in place, she started to take control of the points and get Mirza on the string a bit.

Henin was quick to deflect questions about her elbow after the match, and she really didn't give any indication that it bothered her at all, so my guess is that it won't be a concern in Melbourne.

Both Venus (who will play Sandra Zahlavova) and Henin (who will play Elena Baltacha) should have an easier time in the second round.

Okay, let's move on to day 2:

There are lots of good ones on the docket. Here are the five that I am currently drooling about:

1. Kim Clijsters-Dinara Safina, Rod Laver Arena, 7Pm

In a weird way I could see Safina coming through in this one. No, I don't deny being crazy, but hear me out first. The big issue with Safina has been matches that she was supposed to win. She was supposed to win a Slam when she was No. 1 in the world. She was supposed to beat Petra Kvitova in the 3rd round of the '09 U.S. Open. She was supposed to beat Kimiko Date Krumm in the first round of the '10 French Open. The list goes on and on.

Now here comes a match where EVERYBODY AND THEIR MOTHER is 100% sure that Clijsters will win. That to me sounds like a recipe for a surprise. But I'm not foolish enough to actually think it could happen. I'm just saying that Safina might play looser tennis given that she has absolutely nothing to lose here. And it might be a well played, close match. And I might be crazy.

2. David Nalbandian-Lleyton Hewitt, Rod Laver Arena, 2nd night match

This oughtta be an awesome tilt. Each aging hipster (both players have had hip surgery in the not so distant past) has a huge personality, a tremendous Grand Slam resume, and each is compelling to the fans in myriad ways. Hewitt, the home fav, is loved for his guts, his guile, and his brash and unapologetic methodology. He's fiery, combative, and a proven winner. Nalbandian, another cagey veteran, is known for his tremendous skill set, and his ability to step on court and mesmerize even the most storied tennis greats. It's almost baffling to think that he doesn't have a Grand Slam trophy on his mantle, given all the great tennis he's produced over the year.

This one is being dubbed as what it most probably will be: an all-out war.

3. Jo-Wilfried Tsonga-Philipp Petzschner, Margaret Court Arena, 7pm

Tsonga has definitely earned his stripes in Melbourne. The '08 finalist and '10 semifinalist is getting a bad rap these days for being too injury prone, but in my opinion, as long as he keeps coming back and playing the absolutely captivating brand of tennis that only Jo-Willy can play, than what's the harm? Many have listed 2011 as a must year for Tsonga, as in he MUST stay healthy or his career will be over, but I tend to believe that injuries will always be part of the game with Tsonga. As long as he takes proper care to rehab, he's always welcome back in a big way, and I think he'll remain a threat to go very deep in Slams whenever he is feeling good enough to play with the reckless abandon that characterizes his game.

Meanwhile, Petzschner gave us all a glimpse of how good he can be when he nearly ruined Wimbledon for Rafa last year. If he plays anywhere close to that form, we could have a knock-down drag-out battle here.

4. Kimiko Date Krumm-Agnieszka Radwanska, Court 6, 11Am

Kimiko is the oldest women in the draw and she is, in fact, the third oldest women to ever enter the draw. Aggie, meanwhile, is nearly half her age, but plays a similar brand of tennis. Each is great at deflecting her opponents power, and playing clever angles and touchy-feely volleys. But I'm curious to know what will happen today, when these two soft-strokers go head-to-head.

It's hard to predict, but it is sure to be interesting. They've never met before, and there are 42 ranking spots between them, but this one will probably end up going the distance.

5. Donald Young vs. Marin Cilic, Court 2, 2nd match

I'm not sure why I think this might be a good match. I just do. Young, underachiever that he is, still gets a lot of attention from the USTA for his smooth ball striking and deft touch. He cruised through the qualies (lost only 10 games in 3 matches) so something must be going right for him.

Meanwhile, Cilic has been in a funk that has basically lasted since his coming out party in Melbourne this time last year. He's still working with Bob Brett, he's still got amazing eye-popping strokes, and he's still got his whole career in front of him. The fifteenth seed could use a few breaks, and maybe revisiting the scene of his greatest Grand Slam will get help him remember just how good he can be.

Don't forget these folks are also in action:

Coco Vandeweghe, Rafa, Le Sod, Sam Stosur, Llodra, Baghdatis, delpo, Oudin, Zvonareva, and so, so, so, so many more!

Enjoy the tennis!

What Just Happened? Day 1 review

The only thing that I can really be sure of at this point: Day 1 was a blur. And it's still not over yet.
Wow. Talk about 0 to 150 in a matter of 24 hours. That is unquestionably what happened today. The tennis season was plodding along for two weeks, and now all of the sudden it is at mach-5.

I'm going to start my discussion with a quick look at the joy and anguish of Gael Monfils. Just as there are two sides to every coin, I believe that there were two sides to Gael's compelling come-from-behind victory against the Dutchman Thiemo de Bakker today.

While Monfils' courage was fully on display as he picked himself off the canvas and eventually notched the 8th 5-set victory of his career (vs. only 2 losses), the fact remains that he spent 3-hours and 38-minutes on court in the first round. That is far too much for him.

So, yeah, it was thrilling stuff. But the pressing issue for La Monf is that every minute spent on court in the early rounds of a Slam is time not spent relaxing so that you have more energy for the later rounds. It was great that Monfils dug deep and got things figured out today, because a first-round loss -- even to a stellar player like de Bakker -- would have been a travesty. But the fact that he couldn't get it done quickly and efficiently is bad news for a guy like Monfils.

For Gael to get that breakthrough victory in a Slam, he'll need to be fresh next week, and if he gets involved in these long drawn out matches, he'll be limping into the later rounds.

I could say the same thing about Fish, who also had to come back from the dead against Victor Hanescu. For Mardy, it was the first time he'd ever come back from two sets down in his career (If I'm not mistaken it was a first for Monfils also), and the accomplishment is a testament to all the hard yards he has put in over the last year. But - as I've already stated - the minutes are precious, and Fish, along with Monfils, is now behind the 8-ball, whether they are thrilled to be in the second round or not.

Quotes of the Day:

  • Roger Federer, when asked if the youtube videos where he knocks a bottle of a guy's head are real: "Yeah, I did it twice, that's why I wanted to make sure people knew it was real...Q. You've never done it before and got someone in the face? Well, we couldn't show those clips (smiling). Yeah, that's about it. That's all I'm going to say (laughter). Can't say more."
  • Maria Sharapova, on how she feels about her return to the game since surgery: "Listen, I wish I could be No. 1 in the world today, last year, right when I came back. But I think everything is a process, you know."
  • Monfils on Thiemo de Bakker getting tight in the match: "I was kind of surprised. But I know Thiemo a bit. I know sometime he snap in the head. So this is like a strong belief. We know like he can snap. It's a weakness for him. So you play with that."
  • Venus, to Darren Cahill: "Is there Thanksgiving in Australia?" also..."I've got my own problems, so I'm just dealing with my game and whoever is across the net from me at that moment."
By the Numbers, Day 1:
  • Grigor Dimitrov won 77% of his second serve points in his straight-set win over Andrey Golubev.
  • Sam Querrey and Nikolay Davydenko, at 18 and 23 respectively, were the highest men's seeds to fall.
  • Dustin Brown served 29 aces in his 5-set loss to Spaniard Albert Montanes. Montanes served 1.
  • Players who battled back from 2-set deficits: Monfils, Philipp Kohlschreiber, Mardy Fish
  • Men who lost six or less games in their first match: Federer, Roddick, Berdych, Djokovic (*published after the fact, as this blogger went to sleep after the Henin-Mirza match)

Sunday, January 16, 2011

Australian Open Day 1 preview: Sharapova Leads Off

Maria Sharapova is playing with a new racquet and -- thanks to a first round loss to Maria Kirilenko last year -- no rankings points to protect.
Maria Sharapova will get the opportunity to exorcise some of 2010's demons right off the bat when she opens the Australian Open on Rod Laver arena against Tamarine Tanasugarn. Maria was extremely unlucky last year in terms of draws at the Slams, but in my opinion she's a lot better off this year in Australia than she has been in any of the last four Slams.

Last year she had to open with Maria Kirilenko, and things went horribly for Maria. She played one of her worst matches of the year against her compatriot, spewing double faults and errors (21 df's and 63 UFE's) in the stunning first-round loss.

This year, she's in a lot better shape.

She's back to serving much better, she's gotten a lot of her confidence back after the shoulder surgery, and -- finally -- she's got an easier draw. There are some who argue that being drawn into Venus' quarter is just as bad as what she had last year. Perhaps they are right, but in my opinion, it doesn't get any tougher than Henin in the third round of Roland Garros, followed by Serena in the fourth round of Wimbledon. Wozniacki in the fourth round of U.S. Open was easier -- and yes it was very disconcerting to see Sharapova outclassed by Sunshine in such a big match -- but a lot of that might simply have to do with the fact that Wozniacki played the match of her life against Maria last year.

I think Venus is a better match up for Sharapova. The two have split six career meetings, and Venus is still very dangerous, but Sharapova can slug with the best of them. It's when she has to run like a rabbit that Sharapova gets into trouble, and that's something that Venus doesn't force her opponents to do. If they do meet, short points will be the norm, and fatigue shouldn't be a factor.

I like Sharapova's draw, is what I'm trying to say, and if she does end up playing Venus in the fourth round, I think she'll be a lot better off than she'll have a better chance to make her first Slam quarterfinal since the '09 French Open.

But ultimately Maria's going to have to win a few big matches, regardless of who she plays, to become the Grand Slam threat that she used to be. Her road back to being that player starts today on Rod Laver.

Here are some other great first rounders that I'll be keeping an eye on:

1. Yanina Wickmayer - Jarmila Groth, Rod Laver Arena, 7Pm

I think this is the worst possible draw for the young Belgian. Good thing she's got game, because she'll need it against Groth, who is fresh off her second WTA title (Hobart) and is currently ranked 34. The fact that she lives in Melbourne, and will get the crowd support, will make this even more of an uphill battle for Wicky.

2. Svetlana Kuznetsova - Alison Riske, Court 3, match 4

Sveta's been to the third round at Melbourne every year since 2004. Alison Riske is playing in her first Australian Open. Why do I think this is a match to see? Because Riske -- rapidly approaching the top-100 -- will bring everything she's got, and because anytime Kuznetsova plays there is sure to be drama.

3. Fabio Fognini - Kei Nishikori, court 8, 11 Am

A lot of eyes will be on Nishikori, and those will want to see if there is any difference in Nishikori the player after adding Brad Gilbert to his coaching team. He's got lots of firepower, and if Gilbert can help him develop his tactical approach he could start to move up the rankings. But Fognini is a very tough opponent in this kind of situation. He's never done much in Australia, but he appeared to relish the Slam stage last year in Roland Garros and Wimbledon when he scored huge wins over Gael Monfils and Fernando Verdasco.

This was a very unfortunate draw for Nishikori, and it will be a huge test.

4. Andrey Golubev vs. Grigor Dimitrov, Court 10, 3rd match

Golubev is all the way up to 38 in the rankings, and he's never been past the second round of a Slam. Dimitrov, meanwhile, has too huge of a following for a player who has made one slam appearance in his career. Is Dimitrov ready for the big stage at the tender age of 19, or will this first-rounder simply be an opportunity to get his feet wet? He cites cars, and watches as his hobbies, so first round prize money won't do for long for a man of Dimitrov's taste.

5. Caroline Wozniacki - Gisela Dulko, Rod Laver Arena , 2nd match.

Caro's under the microscope now, and Gisela Dulko has made a habit of squeezing the life out of other "it girls" before. She took out Ana in the second round last year in Melbourne, and she sent Victoria Azarenka to the door at the French and the U.S. Open last year.

Could Wozniacki -- who has switched racquets, dresses, and apparently winning ways (losses in 2 exhibitions, and a first round loss to Cibulkova in Sydney) -- be Dulko's latest victim? Or will Wozniacki prove what Stella McCartney and Piotr Wozniacki already believe -- that she deserves the No. 1 ranking, and she has the game to prove it?

For this, that, the other thing, and more: Click today's Australian Open Order of Play

Enjoy the tennis!

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Interview With Dr. Allen Fox on his forthcoming book: Tennis: Winning the Mental Match

In his new book, Dr. Allen Fox demystifies the psychological elements of tennis, and discusses the keys to keeping it together under pressure.
(Scroll down for an exclusive interview with Dr. Fox about the book)

--- Tennis is a diabolical game, and no matter how we practice our strokes and strategy, no matter how hard we can rip a forehand or how good our serve is, there will always be the specter of another entirely different element the game lying beneath the surface: The MENTAL GAME.

What makes the difference in tight matches? How can mental preparation and emotional calm lead to victory? How can nerves, or emotional angst sabotage an otherwise foolproof player, and cast him or her off to the lot of the almosts and has-beens? How can you — whether you’re a weekend hacker or a world-class junior or pro — improve your chances of winning without even stepping on the court?

In his new book Tennis: Winning the Mental Match, UCLA grad, NCAA champ, and Wimbledon quarter-finalist Dr. Allen Fox shares his theories on the psychology of tennis. Fox, who admittedly suffered from and overcame the usual emotional issues of tennis early in his career, wrote this book for players of all levels with the goal of helping them develop an awareness of their proclivities on court, the pitfalls that lie in wait, and what to do about them.

He covers a great deal of ground, from methods of reducing stress, to visualization, to game planning, and — of course — the time honored tradition of choking. All the while he pulls juicy analogies from his tennis past and present, mentioning real-life meltdowns, tantrums, and those — like the unflappable Rafael Nadal — who’ve embraced and understood the concepts he’s teaching.

Here is the text of an interview I had with Dr. Fox about the book. Please read on to hear what he has to say about his motivation for writing the book and to gain a better idea of the type of material that it covers.

Q: Who would you say you are intending to benefit with your book? What’s your goal and who do you want to reach?

Allen Fox: I’ve done a lot of consulting with a lot of different levels of tennis players, and what I found is that they all have the same problems in one way or another. They differ in degree, but generally run into the same sort of issues. So I am really am aiming this book at everybody who wants to win tennis matches, which is everybody.

The essence of it, if I was really boiling this book down, is that tennis tends to be an emotional game, more so than most other games, and people run into emotional/mental issues that are counterproductive. In fact it’s more difficult mentally than any other sport I can think of, with the possible exception of boxing.

Q: Well, in your book you pointed out the diabolical scoring system in tennis. They certainly don’t have that in boxing. If you put a guy on the ground for 10 seconds you’re gonna win. In tennis you can score a knockout in the first game or the first set, but you still have to come back and start fresh in the next game.

Allen Fox: Of course it’s not as physically scary as boxing, but it requires concentration and emotional control over a longer period of time. That’s one the toughest part of it. Most players can control their emotions for 10 minutes, 20 minutes, maybe even 30, but it’s very hard to control them for 2-3 hours. The professionals can do it — but even they have trouble.

Q: Justin Gimelstob, who wrote the forward for your book says: “one of the most important things that Allen has taught me has been to recognize counterproductive emotional responses when they occur, and to use my reasoning skills to overpower them.” How can you overpower you’re counterproductive responses if they’re already underway?

Allen Fox: The first trick is to recognize what counterproductive emotions are liable to show up. You have to know yourself. If you play tennis for a while, you learn — if you keep your eyes open — how you tend to emotionally respond when things go wrong. You have to learn these through experience, and be ready for them in similar situation. Once these emotions are running, they are powerful and tend to overpower the logic system. So it’s dangerous to let them run. You have to head them off early by having, in advance, an emotional game plan.

Once you truly make up your mind to attack these control issues, you can do it, and do it immediately. I know because I’ve done it myself, and seen it done with players I’ve coached. It’s all been tested. I used to have a very bad temper when I was younger. I wanted to win too much. I tended to get very angry when things went wrong, and I used to lose matches because of it. One day I woke up and said to myself, “wait a second, this just isn’t working. I can’t get mad enough to satisfy my angry urges. I can bite the ball, break my racquets, hit the fence, but none of it will do me any good.” Then and there I decided I simply wasn’t going to do this anymore, and by and large, I didn’t.

Q: In the book you talk a lot about not reacting emotionally after bad points. What should that feel like?

Allen Fox: You shouldn’t feel anything. The point’s over, and there’s no emotional reaction whatsoever. It doesn’t take practice: it just takes the heartfelt decision to do it. It requires a logical and conscious prior decision to counter these natural and instantaneous emotional reactions to errors. Once you really decide not to have them, you won’t. There’s nothing more to it.

Q: In a sense it kind of becomes a part of the ritual.

Allen Fox: That’s the best way to start any pre-point ritual, because you don’t have to dig yourself out of some emotional hole. You start out neutral, and then you can drive the emotions as you wish rather than have them drive you.

Q: How important would you say for all types of players to differentiate from goals and expectations?

Allen Fox: I think it would be particularly helpful with the elite, super-highly motivated players, to get away from expectations and deal with goals. These people have a tendency to get down on themselves if they don’t achieve all of their expectations, which are generally very high. On the other hand, it doesn’t make a great deal of difference to the average person, who is usually not highly driven in any case. (They could actually use a bit more motivation.)

In this sense I’m looking at a goal that is some sort of a shining light that’s in the distance. It’s exciting, hopeful, and positive, and gives players direction and motivation. And the motivation is more about progressing towards goals rather than being absolutely forced to reach them. The expectation is problematic. This is something they feel they must accomplish, and when they don’t, they can get quite negative, disappointed, and unhappy.

The goal should be a motivational tool. It’s a nice dream that players have. But setting goals that are unrealistically high, and then expecting to reach them, and getting down on one’s self if one doesn’t can be a problem.

Q: Can you talk a little bit about short term memory, getting over bad losses and bad points quickly?

Allen Fox: The more emotion that’s involved in an event, the stronger the memory. We’re genetically programmed that way. Things that hurt your confidence, like losses or missed easy shots, are things you don’t want to remember too vividly. And having a reaction or tantrum after a particularly disappointing shot imprints the event more powerfully in your memory. The more emotional you get about it, the more you beat on yourself, the more you remember the failure and the more your confidence suffers.

Q: To realize that there is a connection between the outburst and the fear is amazing.

Allen Fox: The emotional outburst enhances the fear associated with the possibility of error. What I’ve seen is that when a player has been emotionally reacting frequently throughout a match with errors, that player is more likely to make extra errors in the crunch than his better controlled opponent. Correct shots are produced by smoothly functioning habits. And these require a well-balanced nervous system. Getting over-wrought emotionally is rather like kicking the system wiring around. When crunch time comes around the carefully wired habits are slightly disrupted and out come a few extra malfunctions (errors). You’re trying to make this little machine of yours function — you practice and work on strokes over and over — and when you get highly emotional you mess up the whole system.

Q: When I was reading your book I kept thinking about how Rafa and Roger are so unflappable and how they separate themselves from the rest this way.

Allen Fox: They’re better mentally even than the average great player.

Q: Do you think these guys focus on it?

Allen Fox: Nadal knew what to do right away. For whatever reasons, he knew very young what to do. Federer figured it out. But Nadal knew it instinctively.

Q: So Rafa wouldn’t need your book?

Allen Fox: He wouldn’t need it — he could write it. Although he probably didn’t have to go through some of the difficulties, so he might not know exactly what makes him so much more effective than the other players. Federer could probably write the book. Djokovic ought to read it. He’s highly intelligent, but often gets too emotional.

Q: What about visualization? Is that a valid concept?

Allen Fox: What I use visualization for is to create an emotion. You visualize this great return of serve, where your body went into the shot, where your hands were loose, and you saw the ball into your racquet, and you recreated the feeling of hitting the great deep shot. That is helpful because the game tends to follow the emotion. Visualization can help create an emotion that will help your game.

Q: And how does on-court optimism figure in to this equation?

Allen Fox: If you buy the fact that your game will follow your emotion, than as a competitor a big part of your job is to try to create emotions that are useful. Thus you must beware of negative thoughts and immediately react by replacing them with realistic positive ones. Deliberately conjuring up realistic positive thoughts is one of your obligations as a competitor. It’s one of the competitive skills that a player needs to have, just like being fit and having good strokes.

Q: If you could write down three things for a generic player to prepare for competition, what would you write?

Allen Fox: Number one I would write that your game will tend to follow your emotions, so you need to make sure you have positive ones. Number two, stay practical. The golden rule of tennis will save you from problems. This is: Never do anything on court that doesn’t help you win. And number three is to try to reduce your stress. The stress of wanting to win and wanting to perform, yet not being sure you will be able to is stressful. Accept that you are human and fallible. You’ll make mistakes because you can’t help it. Accept this reality. Recognize that the outcome is ultimately not controllable. You’re just trying to do the best that you can, a point at a time, maximizing the probabilities of winning each one, but accepting that there can never be certainty.

Q: When is the book going to be available?

Allen Fox: It’s available on kindle electronically right now, and it will be available early January at Tennis Warehouse and at my home page: allenfoxtennis.net.

Q: It’s a fantastic book and I think the more people that read it, the more people that will become better at this diabolical game of tennis.

Allen Fox: I think it will be beneficial. It has worked with the people with whom I have consulted and coached over the years. My motivation is to be helpful to the majority of players. I have accumulated a great deal of information over the years, and I don’t want that information to be buried with me (laughs).

To purchase the book, visit allenfoxtennis.net or tennis warehouse. It's also available on kindle.